 |
 |
 |
 |

|
|
|
|
| Author |
Replies |
Total Replies: 27 |
 |
 |
Topic: Where God exists?  |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
14 Oct 2009 10:46 am | #16 |
 |
|
Hello Jeena_mushkil2000,
When are you going to visit here...?
This site is free to login any where in the world, don't you know....?
Come and share your opinions and thought for "Where God exists?"
Good Wishes
BTW: Do you believe in God.. HIS existence ... HIS performance.. ..?
|
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
14 Oct 2009 11:38 pm | #17 |
 |
|
Vambanar sir,
yes........
Not sure whether God's omnipresent.
But, Fropper/ internet surely is.........atleast in London.
Shar...
|
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
15 Oct 2009 11:25 am | #18 |
 |
|
Unikorn
Dear Shar,,,
Though God is Omnipresent, though He has all powers of creation etc..etc.. ......He is unable to log in.
But, Jeena Mushkil said I'll be going to London on my work, and on returning here I'll participate in the threads.
It is my doubt whether there is no any PC or atleast Browsing Centres in London?.... whether Fropper Site has been banned in London..? At least weekly holidays not permitted to log in...???
There is some mischieves with this naughty gal ID . I presume so.
|
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
17 Oct 2009 08:58 am | #19 |
 |
|
Aaaaaaaaaaaw Nice of someone to remember me. I would have thought that for some God exists where the Devil/Shaitaan/Satan exists. For some others God exists where ISHWAR does not exist. BUT mayb those some others will find God when they find a MOORTI of ISHWAR that has been INITIALIZED (Sthapit?) in an TEMPLE of ISHWAR after due recitation of the prescribed mantras. Hopefully, those some others will BECOME HINDUS after renouncing HinduISM while worshipping GODDESS Durga's IDOL in the fond belief that GODDESS DURGA has the same relationship with GODDESS KALI that the Devil/Shaitan/Satan has with God ETC. This of course means that ANYONE who speaks English and believes in God can convert to HinduISM like Millions of Hindus all over the world got converted without as much as a squeal from the protagonists of PSEUDO HINDUTTVA castigating the protagonists of PSEUDO SECULARISM. |
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
17 Oct 2009 05:38 pm | #21 |
 |
|
Oooooooooooo Jeena_Mushkil is back in action.......
every thread she touches turns to bright and colour ful with smileys and upper capitals.
Your says denotes where the light is there dark also exists. While talking abt the GO(O)D existings, the Devil/Shytan is also protruding ...????
ISHWAR ( the VIRAT) is the only PURUSH who extended in shapes and sizes, as per MUDAKOPANISHAD.
He Himself sprouts and withdraws as of CREATION.
The examples for this is said as the trees and plants grow from the earth and hair grows from our body without any our effort.
He is capable of withdrawings which he produced.
For this example is said SPIDER. The spider spins net by producing threads. It also withdraws the thread into its body wherever, whenever it wills.
These are all told to be the qualities of GOD.
But where He EXISTS......? 
Can you come out from your PSEUDONYM...? 
|
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
17 Oct 2009 06:13 pm | #22 |
 |
|
HinduISM is the only DHARAMA in this planet,( why... in the UNIVERS) allows and endures all SORTS of commentaries. You cann't and shouldn't shed a word of comment for the any religion in the world to which you belong other than HINDU DHARMA.
Vedas and Ithihasas do'nt talk of KALI or DURGA nor of SHAKTI or SHIVA. All these LORDS created in the due course to teach the illiterates the variety of power of the VIRAT Purush, as the JAMES BOND created by IAN FLEMMINGS.
Now how many ppl know that there is no any SPY person JAMES BOND...?
He has been CHARATERISED as if a living talented spy.
Thus began the PSEUDO HINDUTVA.
btw:
mr. mohan, your post has been activated only after I posted my previous post. Hence my previous post does not address you. While editing this post only I noticed that you've also contributed in this thread. So you are welcome to share your great opinion abt the existing of GOD. As you remembered our old frnd from LKNOW, I too thought with the resembling style of POSTINGS of the old frnd. 
|
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
07 Nov 2009 05:15 pm | #24 |
 |
|
Author : VAMBANAAR says " Vedas and Ithihasas do'nt talk of KALI or DURGA nor of SHAKTI or SHIVA." 1/ Neither do the Upnishad's talk about the Ved-as or the Vedas about Vedanta nor the Ramayan/Mhabharaat of the Tantra Shastra. 2/ Neither does the Old testament of the "Bible" talk about the "New Testament" or the Chapter REVELATION in the New Testament. It is generally not known that the Biblical chapter called "Revelation of Christ" is IN FACT an EDITED VERSION of a number of independent "Revelations" that were woven into one chapter by using the COMMON THREAD and ACCEPTED by Christians of ALL denominations. 3/ Neither is there any mention of SATAN in the original Sura Al Najm in the Quraan BUT all Moslems (except Salman Rushdie)accept the UPDATED version of that Sura. The ONLY people who REGULARLY UPDATED their "Scriptures" on a PRECISE TIMED SCHEDULE (related to the 4 Yugas) ARE THE HINDUS. The TANTRA SHASTRA is THE LAST UPDATE. What a Pity that the "HINDU SCHOLARS" lacked the brains to put together the writings of the various "Schools of Tantra Shastra" NOT ONLY as the "REVELATION OF SHIV TO HINDUS" BUT the REAL TIME LAST TESTAMENT. In fact an ENGLISHMAN DID THAT coz he did not find it necessary to Convert to HinduISM as a recognised authority on SANSKRIT, Tantra Shastra, Doctrine of Rebirth, Chakras and Nadis, KUNDALINI and not least SHAKTI. In Bengal they Do NOT pay homage to Vishnu and Laxmi in Divali BUT TO DURGA as the Earthly manifestation of KALI- the ADI SHAKTI and the SHAKTI of SHIV. |
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
07 Nov 2009 11:59 pm | #25 |
 |
|
Hello Agnyat-the-vas,
Same old booch-booch............... not so agnyaat!
Shar... |
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
08 Nov 2009 12:38 am | #26 |
 |
|
Those frequent appearances that forlorned scriptures make ............not so agyaat!
Shar... |
|  |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
08 Nov 2009 10:46 am | #27 |
 |
|
I am assuming that post nos.25 & 26 are an attempt to enlighten us as to WHERE GOD EXISTS. Having been published- We must accept that these are entirely relevant to the topic - not abusive or personal in nature. Perhaps the (im)poster will care to identify the "EXISTENCE" of God by reference to these posts - unless God Exists IN THESE FORLORNED SCRIPTURES...............NOT SO AGYAAT. |
|  |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |