Hi,

How are you? I would like to take a little bit of your precious time. As we know that the Adam Bridge is a controversial issue nowadays and politicians want to grab and take advantage of this issue by hook and by crook. There are some other issues which show the split personality of politicians and their blind support towards minorities. I think this minorities-bias is very hazardous to our country.



Now, I want to highlight and say a few words about these issues. Firstly, think about Adam Bridge (Ramavaram Setu), and the statements regarding this matter. Mr. M. Karunanidhi and Mr. Buddhdeo Bhattacharya say that there is no any entity of The Ram. Mr. Bhattacharya explains that Ram is an imagination of a poet. I think it is quite hurting to the followers of Hindu religion. Even it is also painful to me though I am confused whether The God exists or not, I am neither theist nor atheist you can say me an AGNOSTIC HINDU. It is so because The Word "Ram" is a part of our life. We say "RAM RAM BHAI! KAISE HO?", "HEY RAM YE KAYA HO GAYA? " etc. Even in central government affidavit (in favour of Setu Samundaram Project) it is mentioned that there is no any existence of Ram, in other hand RAMNAVAMI is a national holiday. What a mockery this is? Why did these leaders say so? Do they want to woo minority electors? Would Karunanidhi or Budhhdeo dare talk ill of Islam and Christianity as they do with Hinduism? Is Hinduism yielding, submissive or it is permissive?

Another matter is related to the protest of Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen in Kolkatta. An aggressive mob opposed this famous icon and demanded her expulsion from Kolkatta. They made total chaos in kolkatta and destroyed lot of precious things and National Property. They claimed that there are many controversial lines in her written books and these lines insult their God. The West Bengal Government supported these people and said "The religious sentiments of our people have been hurted, so she can't live in our state". Thus, Taslima was forced to leave her country-like state which she loves as her own country. In other side, consider the topic of making nude painting of Hindu God and Goddess by famous painter M.F. Hussein and other artists. These much said leader said "India is a secular country and everybody deserves the right to express his views. That's why making Goddess and God's nude paintings are nothing but the freedom of expression. So, the people who are protesting these painting are conformists and fanatics". Both above mentioned incidents in this paragraph are about to similar but the statements of the same leaders are different, why? Are these paintings not religious sentiments hurting? Is this secularism? Do you think that these leaders are objective? Is it deemed by you that these said secular leaders incite people and make them to fight each other? Waiting for your reply ……………………………………………………….



Yours

Tags: