Posted on: Feb 27, '07
To kill an innocent baby
>>
Click here to view original post
Wow, the couple has some audacity to approach the court with such a hideous request!
What kind of daft heads fail to think that they can always adopt a boy child if they want to raise a son? I mean, wouldn't it be good for them as well as the kid who'll get a decent family and living?
"It was, however, adjourned for two weeks for further arguments" Hellooo?? There can be no scope for further argument. The couple should be a) asked to buzz off and go fly a kite or b) be arrested!
"The petitioners have contended that the legislature has enacted the medical termination of pregnancy Act, 1971, which legalises abortions within 12 weeks of conception for limiting the number of children, is equivalent to foeticide"
Isn't there a difference? I don't justify foeticide but limiting the number of children is necessary, hence the step. But in their case it's just not justified! You cannot want to abort a child because it's a girl. No matter what their warped argument, it's not acceptable!
Tags: news, foeticide, female infanticide, girl, baby, kid, children, boy, family, mother, child, father, court, law, legal
Recent posts
